So, the journal, the blog becomes a stress response, something used to counteract panic, a non-aggressive action used to smooth out the stop-start stutter of a life characterised by long periods of waiting and reflection alternated with times of intense activity and periods of blank time (time which does not contain chosen experiences but ones which have been visited on an individual by the demands of family, job etc.)
Perhaps that's why so many (livejournallers, especially) participate in quizzes, memes, or informal interviews, in which the content of a post is determined by random or external rules; an attempt to break out of your own selection habits.
Returning to the concept of "blank time" -- rewriting may attempt to reclaim parts of the stolen time as personal experience; the person blogging about an annoying roommate, new insights gained at a training course, or an awkward family funeral may be taking actions and events felt in some way to be owned by someone else, and through the act of writing, creating a version of the experience liberated from other peoples' expectations and ownership and placed instead within a completely personal (literally, selfish) context.
Which takes me back to the photographer in House of Leaves, who filled his life with pictures because the narcissism of others made him "identify with absence". But there's where it falls down for this character (a dynamic, successful documentary photographer).
Because surely, drawing motivation (inspiration) from absence would drive you to seek out vacant subjects. Or perhaps something even less active than that.
* "(life is too short for) willful triviality" - Dickon Edwards
2 comments:
You’ve got me wondering how all this parallels the history of photography itself - from an exclusive and expensive hobby in the Victorian era - to later being a lot less expensive hobby but still being restricted to special occasions like holidays or weddings etc. but now with the digital age where after the initial costs of buying a camera there are a lot less restraints on picture taking - there’s a massive rise in people taking pictures of quite banal things usually as a form of diary taking.
(I don't know where I'm going with this - I'm still pondering.)
Interesting comments both -- calling to mind two very different kinds of elite:
Firstly the upwardly mobile world of the man in search of his edifying aesthetic, membership signified by an expensive camera and a serious interest in landscapes; secondly, the hard anti-aesthetic of the modern artist, where the camera is an artist's frame, lifing the banal out of experience and making it something extraordinary. Both bring with them a sort of snobbishness (I remember how my friend cym disliked being asked to use her camera for commemorative purposes -- for her, it was an artist's tool, not something to idly use for holiday reasons) and certain values (perhaps barriers) also.
What I see in many of Flickr's photoblogs is more the experience of the camera as toy -- a game to play with living.
Post a Comment